Back to stories

A Democratic Senator and a Republican Congressman Jointly Tell Hegseth to Reverse the 30 Percent Cut to U.S. Fighter Jets Committed to NATO — "Deterring Russia Is Far Less Costly Than Fighting a War With Russia"

August 22, 2026

On August 19, 2026, Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) and Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) sent a bipartisan letter to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth urging the Department to reverse planned reductions in the forces the United States commits to NATO operations in Europe. Earlier in the summer, U.S. European Command announced it would scale back its NATO commitment, including a roughly 30 percent cut to fighter jets, a reduction in reconnaissance aircraft, and the withdrawal of aerial refueling tankers. The lawmakers wrote that the decision and the speed of its implementation would weaken allied deterrence and send a troubling signal to Moscow at a moment of strain in the transatlantic relationship. The letter asked Hegseth to reconsider the cuts and to provide Congress, in writing by August 31, 2026, an explanation of how the United States intends to uphold its commitments to allied security. It arrives against a Congress that has already tried to fence in the drawdown: the FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act set a 76,000-troop floor for U.S. forces in Europe and, through a provision secured by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), requires the administration to consult Congress and allies before changing force posture there. Neguse and Bacon lead the bipartisan effort from opposite parties — Bacon, a retired Air Force brigadier general, has been among the most consistent Republican critics of the administration's Europe drawdown.

5
Statements Recorded
See what your representatives said?

5 Statements

“

NATO is the most successful defensive military alliance in history. This decision and its rapid implementation will weaken our shared deterrence posture in Europe by sending a troubling signal. Deterring Russia through strong support for NATO is far less costly than potentially fighting a war with Russia in the future.

“

NATO is the most successful defensive military alliance in history. This decision and its rapid implementation will weaken our shared deterrence posture in Europe by sending a troubling signal. Deterring Russia through strong support for NATO is far less costly than potentially fighting a war with Russia in the future.

“

NATO is the most successful defensive military alliance in history. This decision and its rapid implementation will weaken our shared deterrence posture in Europe by sending a troubling signal. Deterring Russia through strong support for NATO is far less costly than potentially fighting a war with Russia in the future.

“

Putin's reckless probing of Polish and Romanian territory coincides with the decision to withdraw U.S. brigade combat teams from each country over the last nine months — a decision I strongly disagreed with.