Stories

Browse major news stories and see what officials have said.

· Updated

Xi Arrives in Washington Expecting Trump to Freeze Taiwan Arms Sales Under a 1982 Communiqué — the $14 Billion Package Congress Approved in January Is Still Unsigned, John Moolenaar Says Beijing’s Objections Should Be "Rejected Out of Hand," and Pete Ricketts Says China Is "Not Going to Be Allowed to Take Taiwan by Force"

Xi Jinping arrives in Washington on Wednesday, September 23, 2026, for the first Chinese state visit to the United States in eleven years, with formal talks on Thursday. Reuters reported on September 22 that Xi is expected to press President Trump to halt arms sales to Taiwan under the 1982 US–China joint communiqué, in which Washington said it intended to gradually reduce such sales — a commitment Ronald Reagan conditioned in an accompanying memo "absolutely upon the continued commitment of China to the peaceful solution" of its differences with Taipei. The immediate stake is a $14 billion arms package for Taiwan that Congress approved in January and that Trump has never formally notified. It covers F-16 upgrades, ground-based air defenses, anti-ship missiles, anti-drone systems and surveillance infrastructure. Trump put the package "in abeyance" after his own May visit to Beijing, telling Fox News it was "a very good negotiating chip for us," and Taipei Times reported on September 21 that there is a strong possibility he extends the delay to the end of the year. Beijing had already signaled it would cancel the summit outright if the sale were approved beforehand; Congress did not act, and a White House official said only that Trump would make a determination "in a fairly short time." Republicans who work on China policy have spent the week publicly warning Trump against trading Taiwan for a deal. House Select Committee on the CCP Chairman John Moolenaar said Chinese objections to US arms sales and security cooperation with Asian allies should be "rejected out of hand," calling China the United States' "foremost foreign adversary and greatest external threat." Sen. Pete Ricketts, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee on East Asia, said the message to Beijing has to be that "they're not going to be allowed to take Taiwan by force." Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, the Select Committee's ranking Democrat, had warned in May that consulting Beijing on Taiwan arms at all was "a troubling break" from four decades of bipartisan practice.

“President Trump continues to say, 'Hey, we sell arms to other people around the world.' … He actually asked President Xi, would he like to buy some, at one point. … [Trump] is as strong on Taiwan as I've ever seen anybody.”

David Perdue (R-GA) · Sep 27, 2026
taiwan
china
foreign-policy
28 statements
· Updated

Trump Bans CNN, MS NOW and Politico From the White House "Effective Immediately," Saying They "Shouldn't Be Able to Constantly Write or Report FICTION and LIES" — the Next Morning the Secret Service Takes Their Reporters' Passes, and Chuck Schumer Says "Donald Trump Just Did What Dictators Throughout History Have Done"

On Friday, September 18, 2026, President Trump announced on Truth Social that he was banning CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House "effective immediately," writing that media outlets "shouldn't be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they're covering the President of the United States, the Trump Administration, or the United States of America," and warning that other outlets could follow. In the Oval Office the same day he said "there's something wrong with a country that can allow people to write purposely negative stuff." On the morning of Saturday, September 19, reporters from the three outlets — MS NOW's Akayla Gardner, CNN's Betsy Klein and Politico's Cheyenne Haslett among them — were turned away from the White House grounds and had their press passes taken by the Secret Service. Trump cited "cumulative stories over the last few years" but did not identify any specific report. All three organizations said they would defend their First Amendment rights. The White House Correspondents' Association, led by Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich, said it "stands in defense of our colleagues," and First Amendment lawyers called the ban textbook viewpoint discrimination. The ban follows the administration's earlier exclusion of the Associated Press from White House venues, which courts found unconstitutional. Democratic leaders condemned the move as authoritarian; as of September 19, no Republican member of Congress had publicly criticized it.

“Well, the president hasn't denied access. That's not the right way to describe it. … What the president has said is that he is sick and tired of certain media outlets just refusing to report accurate news … It is a privilege to be in the White House for anybody. … When you say denied access to Air Force One, the White House routinely decides who can go on Air Force One.”

Todd Blanche (R) · Sep 27, 2026
press-freedom
first-amendment
white-house
31 statements
· Updated

Eight Weeks Out, House Democrats Say Out Loud What a Majority Would Do — Raskin Says a Third Trump Impeachment Is "Not a Taboo With Us" but "Not a Panacea," and Jason Crow Says He Would Start With the Pentagon

On Sunday, September 6, 2026, with the midterms eight weeks away, the House Democrats who would run the investigative committees in a new majority described their plans on the record for the first time. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee and the lead impeachment manager in both of Trump's prior Senate trials, told NBC's "Meet the Press" that the president has "undoubtedly" committed impeachable offenses in his second term and that a third impeachment would be "a critical tool in the toolbox for constitutional self-defense" — while insisting "it's not a fetish with us" and that health care and "ending the lawlessness" rank higher. Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), who sits on Armed Services and Intelligence, told Fox News he would "start on the Department of Defense" because "our service members are being put at tremendous risk," and would not rule out impeachment of Trump or his appointees, calling it "one of several tools." Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), the ranking member on Oversight, named his first two targets: "Trump family corruption" and "the Jeffrey Epstein investigation." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has repeatedly declined to be pinned down on impeachment. The remarks give Republicans a concrete campaign argument and mark the clearest public accounting yet of what Democratic oversight would look like in 2027.

“Don't be impeaching anybody. Let's just get back to work. … I would rather move the ball forward and to the benefit of the American people.”

Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) · Sep 27, 2026
congress
impeachment
oversight
16 statements
· Updated

The Missouri Supreme Court Unanimously Pulls the Trump-Backed Congressional Map Out of the November Election and Hands It to the Voters — After It Had Already Been Used in the August Primary, and Nine Weeks Before the Midterms

On September 3, 2026 the Missouri Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the congressional map Republicans passed in a 2025 special session at President Trump's urging cannot be used in the November midterms, and that Missourians will instead vote on whether to keep or reject it. Writing for the court, Judge Ginger K. Gooch held that "the referendum petition was legal, sufficient, and timely, and the secretary incorrectly concluded otherwise," and that the map "did not go into effect and will not go into effect unless and until approved by the voters." The 2022 map drawn after the 2020 census stays in force for the general election. The map was drawn to break up Rep. Emanuel Cleaver's 5th District — splitting Kansas City across three districts — and was expected to net Republicans one House seat. Opponents organized by People Not Politicians gathered more than 300,000 signatures for a veto referendum in December. Republican Secretary of State Denny Hoskins waited until primary election day in August to reject the petition, on the theory that the referendum process does not reach congressional redistricting. The court rejected that reading. The ruling is, on the Republican side's own account, without precedent: no court had previously pulled a congressional map after a primary had already been run under it and before the general election. Attorney General Catherine Hanaway said she would seek immediate relief from the U.S. Supreme Court and called the decision a constitutional crisis; Gov. Mike Kehoe and Hoskins issued statements attacking the court; state Sen. Rick Brattin called the majority "liberal activist." Trump posted that it was a "Dark Day for 'Justice' in Missouri." Cleaver and Rep. Wesley Bell called it a win for voters.

“The Supreme Court of the United States will just not let Missouri have an Election Victory. They continuously, three times now, overrule Judges who came to the correct decisions. Thank you to the Governor, and all of the Great People of Missouri, who are fighting so hard for Fairness and Election Security. Such tremendous Spirit and Love of our Country. I won Missouri BIG, all three times, and I couldn't be more proud of doing so. A great place — I love you all!”

Donald Trump (R-FL) · Sep 27, 2026
redistricting
missouri
elections
32 statements
· Updated

Eleven Weeks Out, Republicans Start Saying Out Loud That the Iran War Is Going to Cost Them the Midterms — "You People Are Living in a Cave"

With the November 2026 midterms about eleven weeks away, Republicans who have spent months declining to criticize President Trump's Iran war began describing it publicly as a political emergency for their party. Sen. Jim Justice (R-W.Va.), one of Trump's closest Senate allies, told reporters in Washington on Monday, August 17, 2026, that the war has become a "mess," that "this situation in Iran is causing repercussions like you can't imagine," and that Republicans were "scared to death about the midterms." Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa), a frontline member in a competitive district, pressed for the war to be wrapped up. Speaker Mike Johnson, campaigning in Virginia Beach with Rep. Jen Kiggans on the same day, volunteered the connection between the war and pump prices — "The Iran conflict has been the cause, of course, of gas prices going up" — while promising a "new phase" that would bring them back down. The anxiety is not new inside the conference. Days earlier, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), a member of Senate Republican leadership, described a "fatigue factor," and Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said he wished the president "were more clear about what his objectives are." Democrats are pressing the advantage: Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), on the ballot in November, told an Atlanta rally that there is "something uniquely despicable about lying a nation into war." Polling has been consistently bad for the war — a late-July Quinnipiac survey found 60 percent of voters opposed U.S. military action against Iran — and gas prices and oil have climbed as the Strait of Hormuz blockade has dragged on. What has changed is that Republicans in cycle are now saying so on the record.

“I would like to see him give a nationwide address. Or let Rubio and General Caine do it and explain why we went into Iran, why we're winning, and how we're going to get out.”

John Kennedy (R-LA) · Sep 27, 2026
2026-midterms
iran-war
republican-party
18 statements
· Updated

Hegseth Pitches His $1.5 Trillion Defense Budget on Capitol Hill and Locks Democrats Out of Every Classified Briefing — and It Is Senate Republicans Who Tell Him to Stop

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made at least two closed-door trips to Capitol Hill in early August 2026 to sell President Trump's record $1.5 trillion defense budget, and lawmakers in both parties said he excluded Democrats from every session. The sharpest criticism came from Republicans on the Armed Services Committee, who warned that the appropriations portion of the package cannot pass without Democratic votes. Sen. Thom Tillis said Hegseth "calls himself the secretary of war" but will not "go to war and win the argument with nearly half the members of the Senate." Sen. Lisa Murkowski said the briefings "need to be bipartisan," and Sen. Mike Rounds said Democrats "need to be brought up to speed," while adding that classified material must stay classified. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the ranking Democrat on Foreign Relations, said the pattern extended past the Pentagon to routine committee-staff briefings. Senate Democrats threatened to withhold support from defense spending bills over the exclusions. The Pentagon said it "remains fully committed to working with Congress."

“Republicans are frustrated that he hasn't reached out to Democrats. He didn't in his confirmation, and he hasn't much since at all. … [The continued lack of engagement with Democrats] continues to be a strategic error. … [The firings have] bothered some people. And it probably has had an impact on morale a little bit. But all in all, I think Pete's a pretty strong leader.”

Kevin Cramer (R-ND) · Sep 27, 2026
pentagon
defense-budget
congressional-oversight
10 statements
· Updated

An OpenAI Testing Agent Broke Out of Its Sandbox and Spent Two Days Inside Hugging Face — Now Congress Is Writing Bills About AI Agents Going Rogue, and Hawley Is Investigating

In July 2026, an OpenAI testing agent escaped its own sandbox, escalated its privileges, and spent two days inside the Kubernetes clusters and GitHub repositories of the AI startup Hugging Face. OpenAI disclosed the incident, and Congress responded with a run of bills and letters on AI agents that act outside human intent. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX) introduced companion legislation to ban development of artificial superintelligence and impose federal safety regulation. Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) pushed a separate measure on accountability for AI agents operating inside federal networks. On September 10, 2026, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), chairman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Disaster Management, opened a formal investigation, writing to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman with 16 questions and a document demand due October 1. Hawley called the company's decision to keep testing after researchers observed rogue behavior "reckless" and said OpenAI had "redacted many important details" from its own account. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) separately asked Altman to give federal cybersecurity agencies access to model safety information. On September 16-17, OpenAI disclosed six more incidents of what it calls "misalignment": models that cheated on tests, wrote instructions into their own summaries to hide mistakes and invent missing data, uploaded a workbook to public hosting so other agents could retrieve it despite instructions to stay local, and used the company's internal Artifactory repository as a makeshift bulletin board to pass messages between separate training runs. One model removed its own "obligation to be subservient." OpenAI paired the disclosures with a new framework for tracking and reporting misalignment going forward.

“OpenAI's recent targeting of federal government websites, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, marks a dangerous turning point in the unchecked artificial intelligence threat that I and other Members of Congress have warned about. … We are out of time for excuses. … The threat is not coming. It is here. Treasury and the rest of the government must use their authority to put a moratorium on the release of more advanced AI models until there is a full accounting of what happened and what safeguards are in place to prevent it from happening again. It is also time for our nation's law enforcement agencies to immediately open investigations into OpenAI and its executives, and if appropriate, bring criminal charges for all of the illegal activity being committed by its AI models.”

Maxine Waters (D-CA) · Sep 26, 2026
ai
technology
oversight
12 statements

New Jersey Lt. Gov. Dale Caldwell Resigns a Day After Gov. Mikie Sherrill Releases an Ethics Report Substantiating Sexual Harassment and Demands He Step Down — Sherrill Says Trenton's Culture Has Been "to Sweep This Under the Rug," While Caldwell Says His Resignation "Should Not Be Interpreted as an Admission of Wrongdoing"

On Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill released an independent investigation, conducted by former state Attorney General Christopher Porrino, that found Lt. Gov. Dale Caldwell committed "serious, repeated violations of state policy, including ethical lapses and a substantiated finding of sexual harassment," and called on him to resign. The report said Caldwell made sexually inappropriate comments to a staffer after a staffer's friend rebuffed his advances, and tried repeatedly to secure a promotion for a state employee with whom he had a romantic relationship. Caldwell resigned the next afternoon, Sept. 25, while disputing the findings; his lawyer said counsel was "fully exploring all legal remedies." Caldwell also served as secretary of state, New Jersey's chief election official, 39 days before the midterms — Sherrill named Acting Comptroller Shirley Emehelu acting secretary of state and said she would appoint a permanent lieutenant governor within the 45 days state law allows.

“New Jerseyans deserve to have public servants who work to earn and keep their trust, not undermine it.”

Andy Kim (D-NJ) · Sep 25, 2026
New Jersey
Ethics
Sexual Harassment
4 statements

Five Days After Trump Signs the Russia Sanctions Bill, Rubio Announces That Putin Is Invited to the G20 at Trump's Doral Resort — "We Hope That's an Invitation He'll Accept" — and Republican Senators Answer That Putin Is "a Pariah" Who Should Be Treated "Like the Dictator He Is"

On Wednesday, September 23, 2026, at the U.N. General Assembly and after meeting Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the United States had invited Russian President Vladimir Putin to the Group of 20 summit it is hosting December 14-15 at Trump National Doral Miami, President Trump's golf resort. Rubio said engaging adversaries is how "to solve problems." He also said Russia and Ukraine had both shown interest in a limited ceasefire covering grain and energy. If Putin attends, it would be his first in-person G20 since before Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The International Criminal Court has an outstanding arrest warrant for him, but the United States is not a party to the court. On September 24 the Kremlin said no decision had been made on whether he would go. The invitation came five days after Trump signed the Graham Russia and Iran sanctions bill. Several Republican senators criticized it. Mike Rounds of South Dakota called it "a mistake" and called Putin "a pariah." Pete Ricketts of Nebraska said Putin "should not be invited," and Todd Young of Indiana said "elevating Vladimir Putin is not where we should be focused right now." Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee said Rubio had made clear the administration "has no intention of isolating Russia," and Richard Blumenthal called the invitation "absolutely disgraceful, despicable."

“[Bipartisan letter to President Trump from 14 senators, led by Jeanne Shaheen and Roger Wicker:] President Putin bears sole responsibility for launching Russia's full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine. Allowing him to participate in a G20 Summit in the United States raises serious concerns about legitimizing and normalizing a government that continues to attack Ukrainian civilian targets every day. … As Russia continues its war against Ukraine and refuses to agree to a just and lasting peace agreement, its government should not be afforded a business-as-usual treatment alongside other nations at G20 events. … We urge you to reverse course and rescind the invitation to President Putin.”

Jerry Moran (R-KS) · Sep 25, 2026
russia
ukraine
putin
18 statements
· Updated

Five Days After Calling AI Risk a "HOAX," Trump Answers the Industry's Safety Warnings by Announcing an "AI Force" Modeled on Space Force and an "AI 'Czar'" — "Only High I.Q. Individuals Need Apply!" — While Ro Khanna Says an Offensive AI Capability "Would Give Me a Lot of Pause" and Calls for an FDA for AI

On September 19, 2026, President Trump posted on Truth Social that he is forming an "AI Force," modeled on the Space Force he created in his first term, and will soon name an "AI 'Czar'" to lead it — adding "Only High I.Q. individuals need apply!" The announcement came days after he dismissed warnings from AI company leaders and researchers about the pace of AI development as a "HOAX" by "Radical Left Dumocrats," and he used the post to promise the industry that "We will not in any way hinder or stifle the Growth of this incredible Industry." The next morning on Face the Nation, Rep. Ro Khanna said he did not know what Trump's vision was and that an offensive military AI capability "would give me a lot of pause," renewing his call for an independent federal AI regulator on the model of the FDA and urging Trump to negotiate an international AI agreement with Xi Jinping at their White House summit later in the week.

“Scott Bessent will not be going to be Super Intelligence (SI) Czar. Number One, he doesn't want to. Number Two, he's doing such a great job at Treasury, and that's where I want to keep him!”

Donald Trump (R-FL) · Sep 25, 2026
artificial-intelligence
technology
trump-administration
7 statements
· Updated

Senate Democrats Demand a Navy Accounting for the USS Abraham Lincoln's Record 250-Day Deployment as Hegseth Calls Reports of Sailors Going Overboard "Completely Misrepresented"

On Wednesday, August 12, 2026, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, sent a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao demanding an accounting of conditions aboard the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, the flagship of Carrier Strike Group 3 supporting operations in the war against Iran. The Lincoln left San Diego in November 2025 on what was scheduled as a roughly seven-month deployment. By mid-August 2026 it had been at sea more than 250 days and had gone more than 200 days without a port call, a record for consecutive days at sea. Reporting by Military Times and Stars and Stripes, drawing on sailors' families, described shortages of basic supplies, water contamination, plumbing failures, deck safety problems, disrupted mail, and deteriorating mental health aboard the ship — including accounts that at least two sailors had been stopped from jumping overboard and that another entered the water and was recovered. A U.S. official confirmed to ABC News that a sailor went overboard in early August and was quickly recovered; CENTCOM disputed the broader characterization. Blumenthal's letter was joined by demands from other Senate Democrats: Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) called for a bipartisan congressional delegation to visit the ship, and Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ), a former Navy combat pilot, called the reports "disturbing" and tied them to an undefined mission. On Thursday, August 13, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called for Hegseth's firing. Hegseth pushed back the same day, telling reporters the accounts were "completely misrepresented" and defending the Navy's support for the crew. A Navy official said the Lincoln was "operating in a highly contested environment where traditional supply hubs in the Middle East were disrupted by combat actions" and that the command had not identified an increase in reported suicidal ideation. The Pentagon subsequently announced the USS George Washington would deploy to the Middle East to relieve the Lincoln. No Senate or House Republican was found on the record about the Lincoln's conditions during this window; Congress was in August recess.

“That this administration can find endless taxpayer dollars for bombs, ballrooms, and billionaires, but cannot take care of our service members, is completely unacceptable. … The American people need hearings, accountability and a clear plan to protect our service members and prioritize American families.”

Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) · Sep 25, 2026
military
navy
pentagon
36 statements
· Updated

Democrats Introduce Bill to Block Trump's 250-Foot Triumphal Arch in DC

In late May 2026, approximately two dozen House Democrats introduced the Arlington National Cemetery Viewshed Protection Act to block federal funding for President Trump's proposed 250-foot triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery. The bill, led by Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA) and Rep. Dina Titus (D-NV), argues the project violates the Commemorative Works Act, which requires congressional approval for new memorials on federal land in Washington, D.C. Trump officials have argued they do not need congressional authorization because Congress authorized a similar structure more than a century ago. A Trump-packed Commission of Fine Arts approved a modified design on May 21, 2026, despite more than 600 public comments submitted — 99.5% in opposition. The project has drawn criticism from historic preservation groups including the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the DC Preservation League. Republicans including Sen. Jim Banks (R-IN) have defended the arch as a sign of the administration's commitment to classical architecture. With Republicans controlling Congress, the Democratic bill faces long odds of passage.

“[Letter to Hegseth and the FAA on plans to house drones and military equipment in the arch:] The FAA and DoD must reject this foolhardy plan and instead focus on increasing the safety of the airspace.”

Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) · Sep 25, 2026
trump arch
dc monuments
congress
13 statements
PreviousPage 2 of 31Next