Stories

Browse major news stories and see what officials have said.

Tag: executive-order ✕

Trump Revokes Obama's Chesapeake Bay Restoration Order and Directs the EPA to Push States to Repeal Stormwater Fees — a Pennsylvania Republican at the Signing Says Families Have Been Billed "for the Rain That Falls on Their Own Roofs and Driveways"

On September 16, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order revoking Executive Order 13508, the 2009 Obama order that created the federal framework for Chesapeake Bay restoration, and directing the EPA to press the six watershed states and the District of Columbia to repeal local stormwater fees — the charges opponents call the "rain tax." The order, titled "Providing Meaningful Water Quality Improvements Through Collaboration and Oversight of Federal Support," reframes Bay cleanup around state collaboration rather than the federal pollution-reduction targets that have structured the effort for seventeen years. Two Pennsylvania Republicans from Luzerne County, where the stormwater fee has been a long-running local grievance, attended or welcomed the signing. As of the day after, no federal official from Maryland or Virginia — the two states most invested in the Bay program — had gone on the record about the order; the sharpest published criticism came from the Chesapeake Bay Foundation rather than an elected official. Stances below are relative to the executive order: "support" backs revoking the 2009 framework and targeting stormwater fees.

“The imposition of the so-called Rain Tax has created considerable controversy and opposition.”

Lisa Baker (R-PA) · Sep 16, 2026
environment
chesapeake-bay
executive-order
3 statements
· Updated

The Supreme Court Lets Trump's Mail-Voting Order Move Forward 71 Days Before the Midterms — "A Giant Leap Forward" or "A Dagger Into the Heart of Our Democracy"

On Monday, August 24, 2026, the Supreme Court handed the Trump administration an interim victory on its effort to restrict who receives a mail-in ballot before the November midterms. In an unsigned emergency-docket order that divided the justices along ideological lines, the Court lifted the injunction U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani entered in June, which had blocked key provisions of President Trump's March 2026 executive order from taking effect in the 23 states and the District of Columbia that sued — a group that includes Arizona, California, Michigan, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The executive order directs the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of confirmed adult U.S. citizens in each state, requires states that use mail balloting to hand the federal government lists of every registered voter receiving a mail or absentee ballot in a federal election, and instructs the U.S. Postal Service to decline to deliver mail ballots from states that do not comply. The Postal Service issued its final rules on August 22, adding new ballot design standards and serialized barcodes on outgoing and return envelopes. The majority wrote that its "disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the government to implement the order will necessarily be lawful. On that score, time will tell." Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, warning the decision creates a "Kafkaesque nightmare" that "needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections." Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Elena Kagan, wrote that the order "merely postpones adjudication" of whether the president may direct the administration of a state-run election at all. The ruling does not end the litigation. A second injunction Talwani issued on August 11 in a suit brought by the League of Women Voters and Democratic Party committees blocks the order nationwide and remains in force, and the states have said they will challenge the Postal Service's new rules. Democratic senators, governors and attorneys general cast the decision as sanctioning voter suppression weeks before ballots go out; Republicans who have long pushed to curb mail voting called it a win for election security and renewed their push for the SAVE America Act.

“We'll use every tool in our toolbox to ensure they know the truth about our elections. We'll follow the law. We'll protect the right to vote.”

Jocelyn Benson (D-MI) · Sep 6, 2026
supreme-court
voting-rights
mail-in-voting
45 statements

Trump Signs an Executive Order Starting the Removal of Gray and Mexican Wolves From the Endangered Species List — "But You Can Shoot Them as of Today," He Tells Ranchers, and His Agriculture Secretary Has to Explain That They Still Cannot

On Friday, September 4, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order titled "Supporting America's Ranchers" that gives Interior Secretary Doug Burgum 90 days to determine whether the gray wolf and the Mexican wolf have met the recovery criteria for delisting or downlisting under the Endangered Species Act — and, if he finds they have, to begin the delisting process. The order also directs greater state involvement in wolf management and changes to how livestock depredations are investigated and how ranchers are compensated for confirmed kills. At the signing event Trump told ranchers they could shoot wolves "as of today." Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, standing with him, explained that the animals remain federally protected and that ranchers can only "sit and watch them destroy their herd" while the listing stands — the order starts a review, it does not itself lift protections. The wolf order was signed alongside a second rancher-directed order on meat processing, antitrust enforcement under the Packers and Stockyards Act, and a review of mandatory country-of-origin labeling for beef — the White House's answer to the backlash from cattle producers over its decision to waive tariffs on 300,000 metric tons of imported ground beef. Republicans who have pushed delisting bills for years welcomed it. As of the following day no Democratic member of Congress had gone on record against the wolf order; the opposition on the record came from conservation groups.

“You're not allowed to protect yourself, right? Or your company, your cattle. So how do you like the idea that I'm letting you do that?”

Donald Trump (R-FL) · Sep 4, 2026
endangered-species-act
wolves
executive-order
4 statements
· Updated

Trump Signs an Executive Order Creating a "U.S. Space Academy" on Par With West Point — and Colorado's Senator Answers That the Country Already Has One, "It's Called the U.S. Air Force Academy"

On August 28, 2026, at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, President Trump awarded the Congressional Space Medal of Honor to the Artemis II crew and then signed an executive order establishing a U.S. Space Academy — a service academy he said would rank alongside West Point, Annapolis and the Air Force Academy, feeding graduates into the Space Force, NASA and the commercial space industry. The order does not actually create an academy. It creates a Presidential Commission on the United States Space Academy, chaired by the NASA administrator, with 120 days to recommend a governance structure, a curriculum, a location and the congressional action that would be required to stand the institution up. Trump said a site would be chosen "very shortly," and noted lawmakers were already lobbying for their own states. The reaction split along predictable lines but with an unusual geographic overlay. Rep. Brian Babin, whose Texas district includes Johnson Space Center, pitched Houston. Sen. John Hickenlooper — whose state hosts the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, the institution that already commissions Space Force officers — called the plan "duplicative, costly, and unserious." Rep. George Whitesides, the former Virgin Galactic CEO, took the proposal seriously enough to itemize what is missing from it: no congressional representation on the commission, no stated purpose distinct from existing universities, and no answer on where roughly $1 billion a year would come from. A congressionally mandated oversight body, the Air Force Academy Board of Visitors, had already recommended against a standalone institution earlier in 2026, suggesting a dedicated Space Force facility on the existing Colorado Springs campus instead.

“Another bold step by @POTUS to ensure America leads in space for generations to come. Let’s bring it to Texas!”

Brian Babin (R-TX) · Aug 30, 2026
space
executive-order
space-force
7 statements
· Updated

Trump Signs an Executive Order Cutting the Childhood Vaccine Schedule and Splitting the MMR Shot Into Three, and the Republican Chairman of the Senate Health Committee Calls It "a Stupid Thing to Do"

On August 10, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order titled "Delivering Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations for Americans," standing alongside Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The order directs the federal government to cut the list of diseases against which all children are universally recommended to be vaccinated — reporting put the change at 17 or 18 shots down to 11 — and states that the combined measles-mumps-rubella vaccine "should be administered in three separate single-disease shots once such products are domestically available," with childhood immunizations given at separate medical visits "to the maximum extent feasible." It also directs federal agencies to support litigation involving parental authority and religious exemptions to school-entry requirements. Trump repeatedly tied the changes to autism, a link that decades of research have not found. The sharpest congressional criticism came from a Republican: Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a physician who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, posted on X the day the order was signed that "this executive order is wrong" and that "the President does not have the expertise to make these changes." Cassidy escalated on a Sunday show six days later, arguing the split MMR would turn two shots into six, six copays and six missed work days, and calling the policy "just a stupid thing to do" and "potentially tragic." Congressional Democrats — including the caucus's physician members — attacked the order as politics overriding science, with House Energy and Commerce ranking member Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) saying it "lets political appointees attempt to overrule decades of peer-reviewed science." Medical groups, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, said no new evidence justified the change and warned about timing: U.S. measles cases are at a 35-year high. States pushed back too. School vaccine requirements are set at the state level and are unaffected by the order; Pennsylvania said its guidelines would not change, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker dismissed the order as "a thoughtless piece of paper," and the Governors Public Health Alliance said the order "circumvents that process and defies scientific consensus."

“Those are things that we want to make sure we study and really engage in before we make those determinations.”

Byron Donalds (R-FL) · Aug 23, 2026
public-health
vaccines
executive-order
21 statements

Trump Orders "Warning Signs" Outside the Smithsonian's American History Museum

On July 24-25, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order, "Restoring Trust in the Smithsonian Institution," directing the National Park Service to install temporary signage on public sidewalks outside the National Museum of American History warning visitors about what the order calls the "ideological capture" of the museum. The order cites a Domestic Policy Council report asserting that Smithsonian leadership "does not present American history as a shared national inheritance to be taught and celebrated, but instead views American history as a 'prime tool' to advance ideas of social justice and the radical transformation of our society." Museum director Anthea Hartig and Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch rejected the report's characterization at a July 21 congressional hearing. House Administration Committee Democrats, led by ranking member Joseph Morelle (D-NY), issued a 16-page counter-report titled "The White House Campaign to Seize Control of the Smithsonian and Rewrite American History." Republicans on the panel backed the order, with Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) calling for Hartig to be fired.

“This EO is a clear political overreach, driven by an ideological agenda to rewrite American history.”

Melanie Stansbury (D-NM) · Jul 25, 2026
smithsonian
executive-order
history
6 statements

Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Trump Birthright Citizenship Order

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 1, 2026 in Trump v. Barbara, challenging President Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship. Trump became the first sitting president to attend oral arguments. A majority of justices, including Trump appointees Barrett and Gorsuch, expressed strong skepticism. A decision is expected by the end of June 2026.

“We are the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow 'Birthright' Citizenship!”

Donald Trump (R-FL) · Apr 1, 2026
supreme-court
birthright-citizenship
14th-amendment
7 statements