Stories

Browse major news stories and see what officials have said.

Tag: syria ✕

After 47 Years, the United States Takes Syria Off the State Sponsors of Terrorism List — and Also Delists the Islamist Coalition That Toppled Assad

On August 24, 2026 Secretary of State Marco Rubio formally rescinded Syria's designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism, ending a listing that had been in place since 1979. The same action removed Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham — the Sunni Islamist coalition that led the campaign that toppled Bashar al-Assad in late 2024 and whose leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, now governs Syria — from the Specially Designated Global Terrorist list. The rescission followed the statutory sequence: Trump notified Congress of his intent on July 8, 2026, and the required 45-day congressional review period ran out without a resolution of disapproval. That is because the underlying policy had bipartisan backing. On July 2, Senate Foreign Relations ranking member Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) — an unusual trio — wrote to Rubio urging him to delist, arguing the legal grounds for the designation no longer existed and that it had become the single biggest obstacle to Syrian reconstruction and to keeping Russia, China and Iran out. Rubio framed the move as a reward for al-Sharaa's counterterrorism cooperation. Outside analysts, including at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, warned that the designation had rested on Syria's ties to Hezbollah, Hamas and Iran-backed groups and that those ties are not resolved by a paperwork change. No member of Congress went on record opposing the delisting.

“These actions were all taken in recognition of the positive actions taken and further commitments by the Syrian government under President Ahmed al-Sharaa to fully distance Syria from acts of international terrorism.”

Marco Rubio (R-FL) · Aug 24, 2026
foreign-policy
syria
state-department
5 statements

Trump’s Own Envoy Publicly Breaks With Israel Over Its Strike on a Syrian Airbase — Says U.S. Intelligence Found No Turkish Buildup and Floats That Israel Was "Baiting" a NATO Ally Ahead of Its Election

On the night of August 17–18, 2026, Israeli aircraft dropped at least eight bombs on the runway and hangars of the disused Abu al-Duhur airbase in northwestern Syria, roughly 45 miles from the Turkish border. Israel's justification was that Syria was on the verge of breaching a security understanding by allowing Turkish troops to deploy there. What followed was a rare, sustained public break between the Trump administration's own envoy and the Israeli government. Tom Barrack — U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Special Envoy for Syria, and the official Trump has credited with brokering the first direct Syrian–Israeli talks — said on August 18 that Washington was deeply concerned the strike was "an unnecessary escalation that does not advance regional stability." The next day he went further, warning that because Turkish forces had no idea Israeli jets were inbound or what they were targeting, they "could potentially have been inclined to scramble their own jets in the belief that they themselves were under attack" — a scenario he said "carried a real risk of rapid escalation into a direct military confrontation between Israel and Turkey as well as Syria." Barrack then said the U.S. had checked Israel's central factual claim and could not confirm it: "We went back to our respective intelligence agencies. The answer we got is, no, that's not happening." On August 22 he offered a theory for why the strike happened anyway — that with Israel's election set for October, "one theory is they were just baiting Turkey, and it's a very aggressive, but maybe well-received, pre-election concept." In the same interview he also said Israel still occupies the Golan Heights "against the UN resolutions," a position at odds with stated U.S. policy. Israel pushed back hard. Defense Minister Israel Katz called Barrack's account "full of inaccuracies" and said it contained "positions that contradict the position of US President Trump," insisting Israel had clear intelligence about Turkish intentions at the base. Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani told Axios he had told Israel directly that his government was not working with Turkey to build up a military presence there, and that Israel struck anyway. The episode matters because Turkey is a NATO ally whose Article 5 protections the alliance has never had to weigh against an Israeli strike, because the Trump administration has treated the new Syrian government as a foreign policy win it does not want destabilized, and because a sitting U.S. ambassador publicly questioning an Israeli government's motives — and floating an electoral one — is not something Washington usually does out loud.

“President Trump has been CLEAR about Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights for years! It seems the Ambassador forgot that or failed to do his research, so here’s a refresher for him.”

Rick Scott (R-FL) · Aug 23, 2026
foreign-policy
israel
turkey
9 statements