“I'm not going to be intimidated into compliance with something I don't believe is right.
The Justice Department Orders 29 States and D.C. to Keep Their 2024 Election Records — and Tells Two Chief Election Officers, One Republican and One Democrat, That They Are "Under Investigation" — Utah's Lieutenant Governor Says "I'm Not Going to Be Intimidated Into Compliance"
September 13, 2026
In letters dated Sept. 4, 2026, the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division directed election officials in 29 states and the District of Columbia to impose a litigation hold and preserve their 2024 election records past the 22-month federal retention window, warning that a "failure to preserve relevant data may constitute spoliation of evidence" that could bring "civil and criminal sanctions." The recipients are the jurisdictions the administration has sued for unredacted statewide voter registration lists containing dates of birth, driver's license numbers and partial Social Security numbers — suits in which, the New York Times reported, the department has lost 23 cases and won none. The letters, signed by Eric Neff, acting chief of the Voting Section, also told at least two chief election officers that they were personally "under investigation": Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson, a Republican, and Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar, a Democrat, whose office had already received seven voter-related subpoenas over three months. Both said the letters were the first they had heard of any investigation. Henderson's office has said a review of Utah's 2.1 million registered voters found 27 noncitizens, none of whom had ever voted. Civil Rights Division head Harmeet Dhillon answered that the letters are "standard litigation practice, not a 'threat.'" The Arizona and Minnesota secretaries of state said through spokespeople that they would comply, with Arizona's office calling any implication that it was not following the law "disrespectful." The letters arrived eight weeks before the Nov. 3 midterms.
6 Statements
“This is standard litigation practice, not a 'threat.'
“No letter — and we've gotten a lot of letters from the Department of Justice over the past year — not a single one of them said that we were under investigation for anything. … What's not helpful is the constant barrage of attacks and harassment and accusations, baseless accusations, that do nothing to help secure our elections.
“Legal disagreements between Utah and the federal government should be resolved in court. It is wrong for the DOJ to investigate or threaten the lieutenant governor for carrying out her responsibilities under Utah law.
“Um, no, I was not aware, but I guess I am now. … It would be nice if the good folks at the DOJ would focus on actual problems instead of baselessly harassing election officials.
“They're just using this as an opportunity to intimidate us, and I'm not going to fold in any way. … But we will continue to make sure that we are not handing over information that does not need to be given. It's fascinating that they're continuing down this track of continued intimidation and continued threats when we've offered to work with them in the past.