Back to stories

Warren and Garcia Demand Trump Name the Managers Behind 21,000 Stock Trades and Explain Purchases That Preceded His Own Policy Announcements

August 13, 2026

On August 12, 2026, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) sent President Trump a 17-page letter — first reported by CNBC on August 13 — demanding he identify the money managers he says control his investment accounts and explain dozens of stock trades that lined up with official government actions or market-moving presidential statements. The letter covers more than 21,000 trades reported in 2025 and roughly 3,500 more in the first quarter of 2026 alone, an average of about 50 trades every day markets were open. Warren and Garcia asked Trump to list "all third-party institutions and managers that direct your trades," explain how they were selected, what mandate they were given, and what investment processes they follow. They flagged 15 instances they characterized as Trump buying into a company shortly before an official announcement favorable to it — including purchases of Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices on January 6, a week before the administration loosened chip export controls affecting sales to China, and a February 10 purchase of between $1 million and $5 million in Axon Enterprises, the Taser manufacturer, two weeks before ICE announced a $220 million Taser contract. The New York Times has reported there is no indication Trump holds a true blind trust; the lawmakers pressed that point, noting Trump personally signed a financial disclosure certifying his awareness of thousands of individual stock transactions. The White House dismissed the inquiry. Eric Trump said the president's holdings are held in fully discretionary accounts run by independent third-party institutions using automated, model-based portfolios, and the Trump Organization called the letter "just another baseless political stunt." Warren and Garcia set an August 28 deadline for a response.

5
Statements Recorded
See what your representatives said?

5 Statements

“

The sheer volume of this trading activity and the timing of a number of transactions, raise questions about whether you are using your knowledge of government activities, your official authority, or the vast megaphone provided by the Presidency to make investments or move markets to your personal benefit—and about whether you have been making decisions that boost your portfolio at the expense of taxpayers, the economy, and national security

“

The American people deserve to know that the President is not using his office to increase the value of his stock portfolios, rather than working to bring down the cost of groceries

“

The appearance of numerous conflicts of interest from a President trading in individual stocks – including the potential for insider trading, market manipulation, and policy decisions that benefit the President's stock portfolio rather than the public interest – undermines public trust in government